351
« on: February 09, 2014, 10:07:45 pm »
I was thinking of exactly the same yesterday but only full members to be eligible to vote on applications but since there aren't much active full members I'm more for option 1, even though some of the applications are more than obvious and it's not needed to be paid much attention, or we can do it as detonator suggested and discuss it privately among the members along with some of the options as you decide and we should include reasons for our votes so when it comes to result the one who is in charge of the applicants to tell them what he's lacking of so he can focus on improving this, but i don't think you will take it in a consideration since it was suggested some time ago.
One more thing, I'm being blamed every day that we accept "noobs" and the one who do it, do not consider the MKt and MKs purposes which I think affect our reputation, what I'm trying to say is that we should pay more attention of improving trainees and scouts and not only by playing A/D (something we can't organise properly no more) but looking after their maturity, attitude and so on, there were and there are some members who aren't saying a single word in english, if they aren't improving in a long period of time we should set them free.
..Something I might be guilty for.
Show Posts
